Best 4x4 in 1970's

[mick taylor]

What do you all think was the best 4X4 in the 1970's and why.
I like the 1978 F100 FWD 5.8L XLT ute the best, not sure if they got the automatic FWD then, but I know the new box type look did get the C6 auto with FWD, but that's 1980's.

So that's for utes is the F100 5.8L 4X4 I believe, can anyone dispute that.

For a wagon 4X4 it's the 1978 Premier Overlander hands down, 5.0L auto with A/C, P/C. how could you beat that.

The 1972 XY 4X4 ute would of been a big deal then I believe value for money and all.

VW Buggy's good value and go places that 4x4 go easy.

Anyone got an opinion on the Toyotas and Nissan or Land rovers etc.

[98TLS]

Old man swore buy these things,only thing that could handle the weight of the tank on back to fill the solos plus all the rest of the gear,he certainly took them some places.

[DJR-351]

Originally Posted by 98TLS

Old man swore buy these things,only thing that could handle the weight of the tank on back to fill the solos plus all the rest of the gear,he certainly took them some places.
image

I agree with your Dad 100%......Bullet proof.

[98TLS]

Originally Posted by DJR-351

I agree with your Dad 100%......Bullet proof.

Bit off topic but fwiw every day his dog May would jump on the back and head off to work with us sometimes things would get pretty dodgey climbing round the side of hills etc always remember one particular day on a rather extreme angle the bloke in cab beside me said "jesus John" or words to that effect and the old fella replied "keep your eyes on May when she gets off were in trouble"

[Vesper Martini]

Hands down the 40 series cruiser a proper workhorse. it wasn't comfortable or powerful but could be loaded up and driven anywhere.


sorry I don't think the F100 would make any top 10 list

Jeeps, land rovers & even Ranger rovers were around back then and were very capable just less reliable than the Toyota

[mick taylor]

Originally Posted by Vesper Martini

Hands down the 40 series cruiser a proper workhorse. it wasn't comfortable or powerful but could be loaded up and driven anywhere.


sorry I don't think the F100 would make any top 10 list

Jeeps, land rovers & even Ranger rovers were around back then and were very capable just less reliable than the Toyota

I would say full on conditions the best was the WW2 Jeep by far.

Yes I like them old Toyota's in the real off road, but I never wanted one to drive on the road at all, I totally hated them then, the noise of the diffs and steering them was crap.

The best thing about the Land rover was if it had a Holden 6 in it, but they would snap axles and the seat was just a pillow type thing that could fly out from under you.

Rang Rovers were not really that reliable.

I do not know to much about the old Nissan but they had their radical followers as well.

Anyone driven the 1970 to 1976 6 cyl F100 4X4 with the 240-6 or 300 6 cyl or even the big Aussie 250 6 cyl 4x4 that would be interesting your thoughts, my dad had a 1976 250 6 cyl 4x2 and it went real well, it got up and went real well, I was so surprised.

But the 1976-7 302 V8's were the most gutless rubbish, I am sure that a 300 6cyl would kill them easy.

One bloke I know had a old F350 with a 6 cyl and a 1979 F350 5.8L and the 300 6 cyl was the better hands down.

So you can find some combinations that are surprising work well or better than you may think.

I am interested in the differences of the Nissan and the Toyota that people squabbled about, back in the days. I just can not remember what they were on about, but it was full on ranting's just like it was Ford vs Holden. ha ha.

[Vesper Martini]

Originally Posted by mick taylor

I would say full on conditions the best was the WW2 Jeep by far.

Yes I like them old Toyota's in the real off road, but I never wanted one to drive on the road at all, I totally hated them then, the noise of the diffs and steering them was crap.

The best thing about the Land rover was if it had a Holden 6 in it, but they would snap axles and the seat was just a pillow type thing that could fly out from under you.

Rang Rovers were not really that reliable.

I do not know to much about the old Nissan but they had their radical followers as well.

Anyone driven the 1970 to 1976 6 cyl F100 4X4 with the 240-6 or 300 6 cyl or even the big Aussie 250 6 cyl 4x4 that would be interesting your thoughts, my dad had a 1976 250 6 cyl 4x2 and it went real well, it got up and went real well, I was so surprised.

But the 1976-7 302 V8's were the most gutless rubbish, I am sure that a 300 6cyl would kill them easy.

One bloke I know had a old F350 with a 6 cyl and a 1979 F350 5.8L and the 300 6 cyl was the better hands down.

So you can find some combinations that are surprising work well or better than you may think.

I am interested in the differences of the Nissan and the Toyota that people squabbled about, back in the days. I just can not remember what they were on about, but it was full on ranting's just like it was Ford vs Holden. ha ha.

WW2 wasn't in the 70s...

Nissan v Toyota debate didn't start until the 80s 3rd gen Patrol. not 70s



I said range rovers were not reliable, but they were around in the 70s plus it was their electrics not their capabilities - see Top gear Bolivia to see what they can do.

[slowsnake]

Originally Posted by mick taylor

I would say full on conditions the best was the WW2 Jeep by far.

Yes I like them old Toyota's in the real off road, but I never wanted one to drive on the road at all, I totally hated them then, the noise of the diffs and steering them was crap.

The best thing about the Land rover was if it had a Holden 6 in it, but they would snap axles and the seat was just a pillow type thing that could fly out from under you.

Rang Rovers were not really that reliable.

I do not know to much about the old Nissan but they had their radical followers as well.

Anyone driven the 1970 to 1976 6 cyl F100 4X4 with the 240-6 or 300 6 cyl or even the big Aussie 250 6 cyl 4x4 that would be interesting your thoughts, my dad had a 1976 250 6 cyl 4x2 and it went real well, it got up and went real well, I was so surprised.

But the 1976-7 302 V8's were the most gutless rubbish, I am sure that a 300 6cyl would kill them easy.

One bloke I know had a old F350 with a 6 cyl and a 1979 F350 5.8L and the 300 6 cyl was the better hands down.

So you can find some combinations that are surprising work well or better than you may think.

I am interested in the differences of the Nissan and the Toyota that people squabbled about, back in the days. I just can not remember what they were on about, but it was full on ranting's just like it was Ford vs Holden. ha ha.

I drove an F100 every week, I was 17 and on P plates, they were police paddy wagons, and we did the service on em, one a week, they hammered 6cyl.

The early Toyota Landcruisers were cool looking beasts, couple of mates had pick ups, both brickies, both 4x4, both for work only.
That is the 70's another mate in Qld had short wheelbase Landcruiser it was deadly, you could not kill it think it was FJ40 so 1977, the Toyota was first imported for the Snowy Mountains Scheme, it was used all the way through, Nissan Patrols were 3 speed, but 4x4, made in that configuration as an order for the Indian Army, on mountain roads they were geared for that, good mate had the F100 4x4 x351ci for towing a car trailer to different jobs, he said it was crap, he was a Ford man too.
In those days of early Toyota's it was par for the course to fit a "Fairey Overdrive"

Just an add on, a good mate of mine cut his teeth as a Mercedes Mechanic and drove a Toyota 4x4, but only a 4 cyl not Landy, when I got back to Sydney from 4 years travelling Qld, Nth Qld, central Qld, NT outback, never worked in Darwin, we were chatting, and I said to him a lot of Range Rovers up in the NT mate, he said to me that if you put a Landy and a Range Rover on a steep sand dune, drove half way and stop, the Landy would dig a hole for itself getting nowhere, whilst the Range Rover was the only 4x4 that could take off without bogging down, he said its why they used them in sandy or desert areas, save your life he reckoned?

[mick taylor]

Originally Posted by slowsnake

I drove an F100 every week, I was 17 and on P plates, they were police paddy wagons, and we did the service on em, one a week, they hammered 6cyl.

The early Toyota Landcruisers were cool looking beasts, couple of mates had pick ups, both brickies, both 4x4, both for work only.
That is the 70's another mate in Qld had short wheelbase Landcruiser it was deadly, you could not kill it think it was FJ40 so 1977, the Toyota was first imported for the Snowy Mountains Scheme, it was used all the way through, Nissan Patrols were 3 speed, but 4x4, made in that configuration as an order for the Indian Army, on mountain roads they were geared for that, good mate had the F100 4x4 x351ci for towing a car trailer to different jobs, he said it was crap, he was a Ford man too.
In those days of early Toyota's it was par for the course to fit a "Fairey Overdrive"

Just an add on, a good mate of mine cut his teeth as a Mercedes Mechanic and drove a Toyota 4x4, but only a 4 cyl not Landy, when I got back to Sydney from 4 years travelling Qld, Nth Qld, central Qld, NT outback, never worked in Darwin, we were chatting, and I said to him a lot of Range Rovers up in the NT mate, he said to me that if you put a Landy and a Range Rover on a steep sand dune, drove half way and stop, the Landy would dig a hole for itself getting nowhere, whilst the Range Rover was the only 4x4 that could take off without bogging down, he said its why they used them in sandy or desert areas, save your life he reckoned?

Yes a lot of Range Rovers in Darwin, the first job I got in Darwin the owner of the house had a brand new 1986 one, I would look over at it thinking I would love to have a drive of that.

I have been in a lot of 5.8L F100's that were gutless as. I do not know why but they all sounded like they ran on 7 cyls sort of.

A mate had a XW ute 351c with a nice cam and 700 Holy DP and the torque of that thing was huge, twice the power of a ADR 1978 351 easy. It had a nice sort of lumpy idle when cold but when warmed up just a slight touch of lump if you really listened you could say hey this is not stock. I thought a 351 like that in a F100 would be the bees knees.

Was the 1978 F100 5.8L electronic dizzy ? I think a lot of them did not advance correctly and a mate had a WB Caprice that I think was the same gutless as.

[FERG_51]

Originally Posted by mick taylor

Yes a lot of Range Rovers in Darwin, the first job I got in Darwin the owner of the house had a brand new 1986 one, I would look over at it thinking I would love to have a drive of that.

I have been in a lot of 5.8L F100's that were gutless as. I do not know why but they all sounded like they ran on 7 cyls sort of.

A mate had a XW ute 351c with a nice cam and 700 Holy DP and the torque of that thing was huge, twice the power of a ADR 1978 351 easy. It had a nice sort of lumpy idle when cold but when warmed up just a slight touch of lump if you really listened you could say hey this is not stock. I thought a 351 like that in a F100 would be the bees knees.

Was the 1978 F100 5.8L electronic dizzy ? I think a lot of them did not advance correctly and a mate had a WB Caprice that I think was the same gutless as.

My Boss had a 78 F100,i think cam timing was retarded to suit emissions of the time. We put a sig erson RV cam and extractors on it which made a huge difference . Was a great tow vehicle all be it a bit thirsty.

[wodahs]

Originally Posted by mick taylor

Yes a lot of Range Rovers in Darwin, the first job I got in Darwin the owner of the house had a brand new 1986 one, I would look over at it thinking I would love to have a drive of that.

I have been in a lot of 5.8L F100's that were gutless as. I do not know why but they all sounded like they ran on 7 cyls sort of.

A mate had a XW ute 351c with a nice cam and 700 Holy DP and the torque of that thing was huge, twice the power of a ADR 1978 351 easy. It had a nice sort of lumpy idle when cold but when warmed up just a slight touch of lump if you really listened you could say hey this is not stock. I thought a 351 like that in a F100 would be the bees knees.

Was the 1978 F100 5.8L electronic dizzy ? I think a lot of them did not advance correctly and a mate had a WB Caprice that I think was the same gutless as.

interesting

Originally Posted by FERG_51

My Boss had a 78 F100,i think cam timing was retarded to suit emissions of the time. We put a sig erson RV cam and extractors on it which made a huge difference . Was a great tow vehicle all be it a bit thirsty.

i had a 78 canadian f250 with the 6 was apparently dead on a farm
they had been driving it with out an air cleaner as the farm hack and when it stopped tow'd to the shed n sat till i bought it $500
turned out that whilst they didnt have the air filter they also didnt have the fuel cap and whilst it was ok to suck dirt it wasnt to get it in the fuel so they had put a rag over the filler , one day it disappeared , in to the fuel tank of
coarse and shortly after it stopped and not cause it was nackered as they thought but fuel blockage
i drove it from the farm (even offered more but they didnt accept)
now the storys set the motor did eventually and quite a few wa high way k's latter , give up its want to live
and a mate had just done a diesel in to his bronco and his 51 ended up in front of the canadian 6's 4 speed crash and that v8 quiet happily chirped its self around the country side in there with no feel of lacking in the v8 power id known in my xy wagon or fairlanes
and still full emission kit from the bronco
sold it many years latter for almost 6k to a car yard

still have a 83 f350 51 now but never driven it yet so dont know bout its power
sold the guy my 2002 v8 explorer and he thru it in with the deal


EDIT:~ and as for the thread Best 4x4 in 1970's to me its the xy ute and for no other reason but it was "different and unique" wasnt done before nor after
and seemed to "go every where" with the 6s torque and low lite kinda wide longish wheel base and just looked cool

[slowsnake]

Originally Posted by mick taylor

I am interested in the differences of the Nissan and the Toyota that people squabbled about, back in the days. I just can not remember what they were on about, but it was full on ranting's just like it was Ford vs Holden. ha ha.

Patrols were all 3 speed, Toyota were 4 speed!
We are looking at the 70's not 60's or the 80's,,,,

[Yellow_Festiva]

The best... on ohhh so many levels

[jaydee]

Originally Posted by Yellow_Festiva

image

The best... on ohhh so many levels

Oh yes, they are big ttttt, tyres.

[oldel]

Originally Posted by Yellow_Festiva

image

The best... on ohhh so many levels

HaHa, I got beaten on the rare local falcon
http://www.allisons.org/ll/4/Ford/XY/

Here's a fun one but don;t know the story of the sedan. mad max stuff.


I'd have to say the landcruisers, jeeps and the brits were the best back then, that's the era they earned their reputation. The F trucks were more chosen for tow pigs, not 4x4 reknown.

[Vesper Martini]

despite appearances even todays Range Rover is very capable off road.

But the 1st gen in 1970 was a game changer see vid from 2:30
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uNGfa2focZw

designed for both onRoad and offroad performace

[slowsnake]

Just one more thing, I travelled an awful lot between 1977 to 81 and everywhere I went, no grey nomads everywhere, just the odd hippies in Kombi Vans, but the reason you drove Toyota Landcruisers and it was the only reason, you could get parts anywhere!
You broke down and you could go to any station or even paddock or outback servo/ bar, and yes all the roadhouses sold petrol, diesel, kerosene and grog!....

But they all carried Toyota parts, all of em!
That is the big deal about em, you could get parts anywhere, but try getting parts for your Nissan or Land Rover?.....lot of phone calls and a weeks wait, but at least they sold beer, icy cold too!..

[Bossxr8]

The Range Rovers were the best by far. They just weren't reliable.

All the others were rough as guts with ****weak engines. More reliable though, if you can handle the broken spine from driving one.

[janddbone]

Rangie all the way if we are talking 70's and actual all round ability. If you want a solo work vehicle then maye the others mentioned.