Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 19-07-2009, 04:55 AM   #91
barbarian
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 363
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mik
actually given that the xy was 300+ kg`s lighter than the current gt you`d have to think that it would easily have been a 13 second car wit a good driver.
300kg lighter than FG GT? really?

It looks at least half a ton heavier with its old tech sheet metal, metal parts through out i.e. bumper bars.
barbarian is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-07-2009, 08:10 AM   #92
The Monty
Just slidin'
 
The Monty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 7,791
Default

65 Mustang - 1160kg
HQ ranges from - 1328 to 1429kg
XY GTHO - 1524 kg
LH Torana - 1143- 1183kg
FG GT - 1855kg
VE GTS - 1777kg

And people wonder why old cars go fast, lol.
__________________
MD Mondeo - For the family
NP Pajero - For the adventure
The Monty is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-07-2009, 10:10 AM   #93
mcnews
Trev
 
mcnews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Was Perth, now country Vic
Posts: 8,017
Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Trev has owned several boosted fords and has really contributed a lot of info on them. His posts in the bike section are also very helpful. I think he should be recognised as a technical contributor. 
Default

You are on the money, it is amazing how heavy the modern Falcon and Commodore have got. And I know where that weight comes from so don't need it spelled out to me. People always look at me like I am from another planet when there new Falc/Comm is about half a ton heavier than an XY/HK or whatever.
__________________
Trev
(FPV FG II GT-E thus the fully loaded burger with the lot as standard +Alpine/Dynamat fitout - 2 of only 4 ever made GT-E factory 9" rear rims - Michelin Pilot Supersports - Shockworks Suspension)
mcnews is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-07-2009, 10:27 AM   #94
The Monty
Just slidin'
 
The Monty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 7,791
Default

I get it all the time. "Oh back in my day, our cars were so heavy, and you could hit another car, and just keep driving they were so strong."
__________________
MD Mondeo - For the family
NP Pajero - For the adventure
The Monty is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-07-2009, 07:29 PM   #95
irish2
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,458
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Monty
65 Mustang - 1160kg
HQ ranges from - 1328 to 1429kg
XY GTHO - 1524 kg
LH Torana - 1143- 1183kg
FG GT - 1855kg
VE GTS - 1777kg

And people wonder why old cars go fast, lol.

This is a good comparison monty. It amuses me when i walk into the garage and the 65 'stang is sitting next to the girlfriends new corrolla. The corrolla is taller by about one foot, wider by a couple of inches, and just as long as it.

With all the car manufacturers worried about fuel efficiency it is amazing they don't make small cars small. Even though the old 'stang cops a flogging she returns 11L/100k's compared to the corrolla being driven like a grandma for 7L/100k's. To make the comparison even more impressive is that one is a 6 spd manual and the other is a 3 spd auto.
irish2 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-07-2009, 09:01 PM   #96
Ratmac
Starter Motor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 16
Default

A small car is no longer a small car
The way it is now is now compared to 10 - 15 years ago:
"Light" = Small
Small = Medium
Medium = Large
Large = Limo
Limo = Luxury cruise liner

The current corolla sedan is longer than the late 80's Camry.
The vectra was bigger than the 80's commodores.
And not to mention how big the mondeo is, it borders on falcon size.
It will be interesting to see when this trend is going to be slowed or reversed, the only car I can think of lately that has gotten smaller and lighter than its predecessor is the Mazda 2.
Ratmac is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 19-07-2009, 09:16 PM   #97
prydey
Rob
 
prydey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Woodcroft S.A.
Posts: 21,692
Default

too true. i have an eb, which was a large family car in its day, and a bf2 which dwarfs it.
prydey is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 09:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL