|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
OzECruisers General Discussions E/N/D vehicles General Discussion ONLY. NO TECH THREADS |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
25-07-2005, 03:19 PM | #1 | ||
The 'Stihl' Man
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,591
|
ok guys now before you shoot me just listen.
I have been talking to a guy that has been working at ford for ages and he says that the stock extractors are really not that much worse than say some PH4499 or PH4480's. Now this blew me over as he is incredibly knowledgable with this sort of stuff. He said basically the main restriction is in the cat and the exhaust system itself. Without going into great detail, there is apparently an ADR that says that once your car has covered more than 80,000kms that it does not have to meet emission laws. And unless you get pulled over and asked to get tested there is nothing the police can do. With euro4 coming in this will change to 160,000km's; but for us its 80. So does anyone have any dyno/track proof that some paccies or whatever will make a difference (before and after; just extractor change). I just want to see some data, not a bum-o-meter figure. He also said that aftermarket extractors dont nesessarly increase power but they do change the range in which you get the peak. What do you think?
__________________
|
||
25-07-2005, 03:29 PM | #2 | ||
Custom User Title:
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 651
|
There's lots of other things to discuss in your topic, but I'm gonna single out the comment about the cat. I always thought that it was the headers and exhaust restricting the stock system, not the cat. I always heard they were pretty beefy and not worth upgrading (I have a high-flow cat so I've never investigated)
Him saying the Ford cats are restrictive simply doesn't make sense to me.
__________________
____________
Just sometimes, in between the first cigarette with coffee in the morning to that four hundredth glass of cornershop p**s at 3am, you do sometimes look at yourself and think... this is fantastic. I'm in heaven. |
||
25-07-2005, 03:40 PM | #3 | ||
Last warning
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Mornington Peninsula, Victoria HeadCount: 3
Posts: 11,194
|
the stock manifold may not be 'restrictive'
but extractor design is 1/2 the gain with extractors. the ability to design for midrange or top end power, etc.
__________________
FALCN6 - Turbo, Air Bag Suspension - Hibernating EL GT - Supercharged NASCAR - 83 Thunderbird , Bagged DAILY - BA Fairlane Ghia, Boss 260 Turbo OFFROADER - Ford Explorer |
||
25-07-2005, 03:45 PM | #4 | ||
The 'Stihl' Man
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,591
|
So there is a definate gain? Or a perceived gain/shift in power range?
He said that if you drill the cat (not completely empty so the cops can tell) then that alone with a good exhaust (cat back) will give good results. Im not taking it as gospel, but I thought I would bring it up. Companies say that there is an increase in power but where is the proof is what Im getting at mainly.
__________________
|
||
25-07-2005, 03:47 PM | #5 | ||
Custom User Title:
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 651
|
Well, umm, yeah if you drill the cat you'll get improved performance, but you might as well run NOS... It's illegal.
__________________
____________
Just sometimes, in between the first cigarette with coffee in the morning to that four hundredth glass of cornershop p**s at 3am, you do sometimes look at yourself and think... this is fantastic. I'm in heaven. |
||
25-07-2005, 04:14 PM | #6 | ||
The 'Stihl' Man
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,591
|
NOS is just a tad easier to detect than a drilled out cat. If you completely gut the cat then knock on it its very noticeable. But if you drill it then its still going to have some of the stuff left inside and not be as detectable.
Ok can we keep it on topic. Has anyone got any data?
__________________
|
||
25-07-2005, 07:28 PM | #7 | ||
Team Urinal Cake Racing
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,075
|
What was his job at ford????? Just coz he works there doesn't mean he knows what hes on about. Gutted cat???? lol ull get about 1/2 a kilowatt if that and u cant really feel that at all can you?
Extractors are definately better than the stock manifold, more power and torque everywhere even with bolted up to the stock exaust system the extractors would outperform the stock exaust manifold. But would obviously work better with a full sysem |
||
25-07-2005, 07:50 PM | #8 | ||
likes falcon's
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,091
|
4litres need to breath
going from full zorst to a stok zorst on same car, just felt gutless!
__________________
www.carhubsales.com.au |
||
25-07-2005, 07:56 PM | #9 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: South East Melbourne
Posts: 6,156
|
Whoever said there is an ADR that allows cars that old to pass emission laws is having a lend of you. If it were true, why do people get pulled up in XC/XD/XE with no carbon canisters and why would it be illegal to hollow out your cat?
As for this guy, what's his job? Floor cleaner? Cos he knows SFA about exhaust systems. A stock intake manifold and a set of extractors have very little in common. A manifold needs the pressure from the exhaust stroke to move gases out. Extractors are made so they create low pressure areas to help draw exhaust gas out. |
||
25-07-2005, 08:12 PM | #10 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: melbourne
Posts: 317
|
hollowing out a cat just defeats the reason for having a cat and there is a $10,000 fine if you dont run a cat
one of my dad's m8's got an exhaust fitted and they gave him a stright pipe that he could replace the cat with, but they wouldn't fit it for him because it's a $10,000 fine so he had to do it at home. |
||
25-07-2005, 08:19 PM | #11 | ||
likes falcon's
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,091
|
unless you got stupid power from your motor, a cat will not eat your power lol...
if you want no cat, do wat psycho said and get xe downwards or any car bfor 1987 and u can go stupid with exhaust as the laws wernt passed then
__________________
www.carhubsales.com.au |
||
25-07-2005, 08:26 PM | #12 | ||
TL40 Wagon?
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,377
|
The stock cast iron exhaust manifold would come any where near being called extractors. Its the manifold they designed for the canadian tractor engine in the XM 144 CI engine.
Pacies worked for me before and after dyno in my gallery is there for all to see. This was before totally stock and after PH4480 extractors 2.5" system with a hi flow cat. The hi flow cat was a con there is no power gain here just easier for the exhaust shop to fabricate and fit. |
||
25-07-2005, 09:31 PM | #13 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: South Australia
Posts: 227
|
I agree with all you guys, in that extractors will definatly outperform standard manifolds. I'm yet to get my Ph4480's..
But maybe he is talking about the factory extractors fitted to XR's compared to the likes of pacies and lukey, etc.
__________________
5 Speed EL Futura 140rwkw last dyno |
||
25-07-2005, 11:54 PM | #14 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: South East Melbourne
Posts: 6,156
|
XRs have the exact same manifold as any other Falcon.
|
||
26-07-2005, 09:01 AM | #15 | ||
The 'Stihl' Man
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,591
|
yeah guys settle. Obviously Im not going to name names but he has worked all over the place within the company.
I thought it was a bit weird too, so I just wanted to run it by; guess ill just have to prove him wrong. Ill get more info on that ADR...he swears black and blue that its true. Hold tight.
__________________
|
||
26-07-2005, 02:47 PM | #16 | ||
OzECruisers Treasurer
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,176
|
manifold [U][I] yes get one
|
||
26-07-2005, 06:22 PM | #17 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: South East Melbourne
Posts: 6,156
|
Tell him I want to be in the car when he gets pulled up with no cat, no carbon canister, etc, etc, then we'll see how true it is.
|
||
26-07-2005, 11:03 PM | #18 | ||
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
All i did to mine is got some pipe welded into the center of it so whene they knock on it it's still got all the guts in there but it just runs straight through the pipe i had welded in there if your a good welder you can do it your self. I thought it was worth it. If you can get anothrt cat on the cheap i would do it to that incase you weren't happy with the outcome. :
|
||
26-07-2005, 11:19 PM | #19 | ||
Ute Forum Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melb
Posts: 7,227
|
When the first XR6 came out the reason they gave for not going to extractors was there was only a 5kW increase in power - now this may be different with some of the newer designs on the market now but the fact remains that the ohc exhaust manifold is nowhere as bad as the old "log" style manifolds that used to be fitted to cars.
Dragon what you did is illegal too. |
||