Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > Club and Speciality Forums > Forum Community Car Clubs > OzECruisers (E/N/D Series) > OzECruisers General Discussions

OzECruisers General Discussions E/N/D vehicles General Discussion ONLY. NO TECH THREADS

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 14-03-2005, 06:35 PM   #1
falcon_ea-ed
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 79
Default Compression ratio

I heard some decent power gains can be achieved from raising the compression ratio is this true? where can you get this done at/ how much does it cost.
any Info would be greatly appreciated.
My car is an EB2 S-Pac
Thanks,
falcon_ea-ed is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 14-03-2005, 06:55 PM   #2
Walkinshaw
Two > One
 
Walkinshaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 7,063
Default

can be done by 3 methods

1, decking the head
2, running flat top pistons
3, thinner head gasket

neither are cheap
__________________
1978 LTD - 408ci - 11.5@120.6mph -
2004 S4 - 4.2 - M6 - quattro -

Walkinshaw is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-03-2005, 08:34 AM   #3
Thanatos
E-Series Owners Club
 
Thanatos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sth. East. Suburbs, Melbourne
Posts: 781
Default

IMO it's not worth changing the compression ratio and nothing else. The gains just don't justify the cost.

If a headgasket blows, or you are planning a rebuild or worked head, then do it at the same time, but the gains are very negligable, so don't go to too much trouble to do it.
Thanatos is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-03-2005, 08:40 AM   #4
Sox
RIP...
 
Sox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 15,524
Community Builder: In recognition of those who have helped build the AFF community. - Issue reason: As recommended by Ropcher. Personifies the spirit of AFF. 
Default

I'm not sure what cost you guys are talking about here, skimming a head costs approx $40, and a metal gasket costs <$90.
For less than $150 you can raise CR by at leat 1/2 a point, which will certainly help throttle response and increase fuel economy.

Rick.
__________________
.
Oval Everywhere...
Sox is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-03-2005, 08:43 AM   #5
EFFalcon
Last warning
 
EFFalcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Mornington Peninsula, Victoria HeadCount: 3
Posts: 11,194
Default

$150 + labour...
not everyone is game enough to do a headgasket change themselves.
__________________
FALCN6 - Turbo, Air Bag Suspension - Hibernating
EL GT - Supercharged
NASCAR - 83 Thunderbird , Bagged
DAILY - BA Fairlane Ghia, Boss 260 Turbo
OFFROADER - Ford Explorer
EFFalcon is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-03-2005, 08:45 AM   #6
Sox
RIP...
 
Sox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 15,524
Community Builder: In recognition of those who have helped build the AFF community. - Issue reason: As recommended by Ropcher. Personifies the spirit of AFF. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EFFalcon
$150 + labour...
not everyone is game enough to do a headgasket change themselves.
Yep, add another $200 for labour, still not bad for the gains.
And it will complemant any cam upgrades in the furture.

Rick.
__________________
.
Oval Everywhere...
Sox is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-03-2005, 08:47 AM   #7
Thanatos
E-Series Owners Club
 
Thanatos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sth. East. Suburbs, Melbourne
Posts: 781
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sox
I'm not sure what cost you guys are talking about here, skimming a head costs approx $40, and a metal gasket costs <$90.
For less than $150 you can raise CR by at leat 1/2 a point, which will certainly help throttle response and increase fuel economy.

Rick.
As john said, not everyone is game enough to do the work themselves.

Not to mention the fact that, even if you do it yourself, it's a lot of trouble to go to for bugger all gain.

I still maintain that there's not a lot of point unless you have the head off for another reason ;)
Thanatos is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-03-2005, 08:48 AM   #8
EFFalcon
Last warning
 
EFFalcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Mornington Peninsula, Victoria HeadCount: 3
Posts: 11,194
Default

personally i think that $350 is better spent on perhaps a exhaust upgrade, maybe cam change if thats done.
I'd wait for the headgasket to go or the head to come off for some other work before worrying about it (unless ofcourse u can do it all yourself)
__________________
FALCN6 - Turbo, Air Bag Suspension - Hibernating
EL GT - Supercharged
NASCAR - 83 Thunderbird , Bagged
DAILY - BA Fairlane Ghia, Boss 260 Turbo
OFFROADER - Ford Explorer
EFFalcon is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-03-2005, 09:36 AM   #9
Sox
RIP...
 
Sox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 15,524
Community Builder: In recognition of those who have helped build the AFF community. - Issue reason: As recommended by Ropcher. Personifies the spirit of AFF. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EFFalcon
personally i think that $350 is better spent on perhaps a exhaust upgrade, maybe cam change if thats done.
This is debatable.
$350 spent on raising CR on it's own won't raise peak power, however it will increase low and midrange torque by a noticeable amount, anything up to 10nm.

Extractors/exhaust will cost at least $800, fitted. This will yield an improvement right across the range if decent extractors are used. Though realistically we won't see much more than 10kw increase.

So 10kw of power for $800 or 10nm of torque for $350.
You do the math.

Rick.
__________________
.
Oval Everywhere...
Sox is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-03-2005, 09:40 AM   #10
Walkinshaw
Two > One
 
Walkinshaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 7,063
Default

I think what the other guys are getting at may be that it may be adviseable to do headwork in one go. Instead of removing the head just to raise CR, why not plan ahead and with the head off, get it decked, ported, port matched, whack a new cam in all at once to save a bit of mucking arround and labour
__________________
1978 LTD - 408ci - 11.5@120.6mph -
2004 S4 - 4.2 - M6 - quattro -

Walkinshaw is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-03-2005, 09:43 AM   #11
Thanatos
E-Series Owners Club
 
Thanatos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sth. East. Suburbs, Melbourne
Posts: 781
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Walkinshaw
I think what the other guys are getting at may be that it may be adviseable to do headwork in one go. Instead of removing the head just to raise CR, why not plan ahead and with the head off, get it decked, ported, port matched, whack a new cam in all at once to save a bit of mucking arround and labour
Exactly ;)
Thanatos is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-03-2005, 09:44 AM   #12
EFFalcon
Last warning
 
EFFalcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Mornington Peninsula, Victoria HeadCount: 3
Posts: 11,194
Default

well judging by the fact that falcon_ea-ed isnt confident in changing a cam, i imagine a headgasket change is a little further out of reach. therefore waiting for the head to come off for another reason will in the end, save money.
unless u want to pay someone twice (also $200 for labour sounds a bit optomistic to me) then i'd suggest waiting and spending (saving) money for other things they may want.
__________________
FALCN6 - Turbo, Air Bag Suspension - Hibernating
EL GT - Supercharged
NASCAR - 83 Thunderbird , Bagged
DAILY - BA Fairlane Ghia, Boss 260 Turbo
OFFROADER - Ford Explorer
EFFalcon is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-03-2005, 09:50 AM   #13
Sox
RIP...
 
Sox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 15,524
Community Builder: In recognition of those who have helped build the AFF community. - Issue reason: As recommended by Ropcher. Personifies the spirit of AFF. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Walkinshaw
I think what the other guys are getting at may be that it may be adviseable to do headwork in one go. Instead of removing the head just to raise CR, why not plan ahead and with the head off, get it decked, ported, port matched, whack a new cam in all at once to save a bit of mucking arround and labour
Naturally.
Though my point is that there are gains to be had, and in the case where a head gasket is on it's way out (very common in E series cars), the job may be closer than anticipated, and then well worth doing.

Rick.
__________________
.
Oval Everywhere...
Sox is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-03-2005, 09:55 AM   #14
Thanatos
E-Series Owners Club
 
Thanatos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sth. East. Suburbs, Melbourne
Posts: 781
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sox
Though my point is that there are gains to be had, and in the case where a head gasket is on it's way out (very common in E series cars), the job may be closer than anticipated, and then well worth doing.
Hmmm, this sounds like exactly what everyone else has been saying!

Arguing just for the sake of arguing again, Rick?? :P
Thanatos is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-03-2005, 10:03 AM   #15
Sox
RIP...
 
Sox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 15,524
Community Builder: In recognition of those who have helped build the AFF community. - Issue reason: As recommended by Ropcher. Personifies the spirit of AFF. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thanatos
Hmmm, this sounds like exactly what everyone else has been saying!
Not quite matey, you said there is bugger all gain, which is clearly wrong.
Quote:
Arguing just for the sake of arguing again, Rick?? :P
Maybe it's just a case of you don't like being proven wrong.

Rick.
__________________
.
Oval Everywhere...
Sox is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-03-2005, 10:13 AM   #16
Thanatos
E-Series Owners Club
 
Thanatos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sth. East. Suburbs, Melbourne
Posts: 781
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sox
Not quite matey, you said there is bugger all gain, which is clearly wrong.
What i said is that the gains don't justify the head being taken off JUST to raise the compression ratio.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sox
Maybe it's just a case of you don't like being proven wrong.

Rick.
Show me where i've been proven wrong??

The way i see it, everyone else has agreed 100% on this topic, including you in your previous post :P

Like i said, arguing for the sake of arguing ;)
Thanatos is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-03-2005, 10:14 AM   #17
Walkinshaw
Two > One
 
Walkinshaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 7,063
Default

For the effort of removing the head i think there is bugger all gain. If im going to the trouble of pulling the head I'd want to see some quite significant (+15-20rwkw combined with a suitable cam) gains.
__________________
1978 LTD - 408ci - 11.5@120.6mph -
2004 S4 - 4.2 - M6 - quattro -

Walkinshaw is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-03-2005, 10:27 AM   #18
Sox
RIP...
 
Sox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 15,524
Community Builder: In recognition of those who have helped build the AFF community. - Issue reason: As recommended by Ropcher. Personifies the spirit of AFF. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thanatos
What i said is that the gains don't justify the head being taken off JUST to raise the compression ratio.
See post #7, 'bugger all gain', your words.
Quote:
Show me where i've been proven wrong??
Just did, again.
Quote:
The way i see it, everyone else has agreed 100% on this topic, including you in your previous post :P

Like i said, arguing for the sake of arguing ;)
No matey, just the facts....

Rick.
__________________
.
Oval Everywhere...
Sox is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-03-2005, 10:30 AM   #19
Thanatos
E-Series Owners Club
 
Thanatos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sth. East. Suburbs, Melbourne
Posts: 781
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sox
See post #7, 'bugger all gain', your words.

Just did, again.

No matey, just the facts....

Rick.
Hmmm, well, if you read that in conjuction with my previous post, you will understand that i was talking relative to the amount of effort required to take the head off (if done JUST for the reason of upping compression).


I guess that's my mistake, i must've over-estimated your intelligence. :P
Thanatos is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-03-2005, 10:49 AM   #20
chelvdog
Soul baby
 
chelvdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 212
Default

Considering there are so many other bolt on options for the I6, ripping a head off to gain half a point of compression sounds a bit over the top to me. Wait til your head gasket lets loose : then if you want to get some more compression, the results might justify the effort and cost.

It looks like we've got a couple of main events about to start...

Thanatos V. Sox and Yagz V. Sunny
__________________
People don't kill people, lawn mowers kill people.
chelvdog is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-03-2005, 10:53 AM   #21
Walkinshaw
Two > One
 
Walkinshaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 7,063
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chelvdog
Considering there are so many other bolt on options for the I6, ripping a head off to gain half a point of compression sounds a bit over the top to me. Wait til your head gasket lets loose : then if you want to get some more compression, the results might justify the effort and cost.

It looks like we've got a couple of main events about to start...

Thanatos V. Sox and Yagz V. Sunny
Better add Yags V. Walkinshaw in there...............another thread was a bit like a boxers weigh in.

Back on topic, If you have the chance to up the CR, do it, but i wouldnt recoment removing the head for that sole purpose.
__________________
1978 LTD - 408ci - 11.5@120.6mph -
2004 S4 - 4.2 - M6 - quattro -

Walkinshaw is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-03-2005, 10:54 AM   #22
Thanatos
E-Series Owners Club
 
Thanatos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sth. East. Suburbs, Melbourne
Posts: 781
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chelvdog
It looks like we've got a couple of main events about to start...

Thanatos V. Sox and Yagz V. Sunny
I can't speak for Sox, but i have no hard feelings. We've been going at this since the early days! lol

It's one of those agree to disagree things, i think! (/me waits for Sox to say he doesn't agree with that! :P) lol
Thanatos is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-03-2005, 10:57 AM   #23
chelvdog
Soul baby
 
chelvdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 212
Default

Everyone's got an opinion, it's just hard for some people to accept that others may think differently.... I must be getting sentimental in my old age....
__________________
People don't kill people, lawn mowers kill people.
chelvdog is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-03-2005, 11:52 AM   #24
Sox
RIP...
 
Sox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 15,524
Community Builder: In recognition of those who have helped build the AFF community. - Issue reason: As recommended by Ropcher. Personifies the spirit of AFF. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Walkinshaw
Better add Yags V. Walkinshaw in there...............another thread was a bit like a boxers weigh in.
Ooh, where's this thread, can I play too????

Rick.
__________________
.
Oval Everywhere...
Sox is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-03-2005, 11:55 AM   #25
Sox
RIP...
 
Sox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 15,524
Community Builder: In recognition of those who have helped build the AFF community. - Issue reason: As recommended by Ropcher. Personifies the spirit of AFF. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thanatos
I can't speak for Sox, but i have no hard feelings. We've been going at this since the early days! lol

It's one of those agree to disagree things, i think! (/me waits for Sox to say he doesn't agree with that! :P) lol
I'll agree with the above, but I won't agree with anything else you say, but on the other hand I could agree to disagree.........

Anyway, no hard feelings from me ever, I don't take things like this seriously enough, everyone has a right to there opinion, even if they are wrong. :1syellow1

Rick.
__________________
.
Oval Everywhere...
Sox is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-03-2005, 12:53 PM   #26
Yagz
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 522
Default

OK.

End result of this thread, and to answer the question of the original poster;

Yes, increasing the compression ratio will give you improved performance,

and,

NO it is not the cheapest bang for buck modification you could do unless you are willing to remove the head/change pistons yourself.

See, wasn't so hard, was it? :P
Yagz is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-03-2005, 01:11 PM   #27
Walkinshaw
Two > One
 
Walkinshaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 7,063
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yagz
OK.

End result of this thread, and to answer the question of the original poster;

Yes, increasing the compression ratio will give you improved performance,

and,

NO it is not the cheapest bang for buck modification you could do unless you are willing to remove the head/change pistons yourself.

See, wasn't so hard, was it? :P
BINGO. This was also said about 3x above......end of story.
__________________
1978 LTD - 408ci - 11.5@120.6mph -
2004 S4 - 4.2 - M6 - quattro -

Walkinshaw is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 15-03-2005, 05:05 PM   #28
falcon_ea-ed
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 79
Default

thanks for all the replies- i understand that yes power gains are achievable but it dost cost some $$$ if you dont do the work yourself- better to wait till the head goes
Thanks.
falcon_ea-ed is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 05:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL